Sri Lanka vs Togo: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Sri Lanka
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 13,221 t against 11,796 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1,425 t.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 125th and Togo ranks 122nd of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 6 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,916 t | 2,292 t | 15,625 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 16,900 t | 2,675 t | 14,225 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 19,045 t | 3,110 t | 15,935 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 16,517 t | 4,146 t | 12,371 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 10,422 t | 5,676 t | 4,746 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 11,540 t | 9,653 t | 1,887 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 12,130 t | 12,688 t | 558.43 t | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Sri Lanka or Togo?
- Togo, at 13,221 t against 11,796 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Sri Lanka and Togo?
- 1,425 t, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Togo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Sri Lanka and Togo rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Sri Lanka ranks 125th and Togo ranks 122nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).