Sudan vs Tajikistan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Sudan
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 95,196 t against 93,373 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 1,823 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 50th and Tajikistan ranks 51st of 200 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 94,958 t | 83,659 t | 11,299 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 95,746 t | 93,946 t | 1,800 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Sudan or Tajikistan?
- Sudan, at 95,196 t against 93,373 t in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Sudan and Tajikistan?
- 1,823 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Tajikistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sudan and Tajikistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Sudan ranks 50th and Tajikistan ranks 51st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).