Suriname vs Vanuatu: Manure applied — Cropland potassium
Manure applied — Cropland potassium over time
- Suriname
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 1,150 t against 825.91 t in Suriname, a difference of 324.09 t.
That makes Vanuatu's figure about 1.4 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.
Suriname ranks 169th and Vanuatu ranks 166th of 200 countries.
Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 646.58 t | 698.24 t | 51.66 t | Vanuatu |
| 1970s | 746.74 t | 1,021 t | 273.99 t | Vanuatu |
| 1980s | 944.54 t | 1,138 t | 193.31 t | Vanuatu |
| 1990s | 1,109 t | 1,365 t | 255.33 t | Vanuatu |
| 2000s | 782.32 t | 1,512 t | 729.41 t | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 880.41 t | 1,544 t | 663.88 t | Vanuatu |
| 2020s | 884.11 t | 1,171 t | 287.37 t | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium, Suriname or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 1,150 t against 825.91 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium between Suriname and Vanuatu?
- 324.09 t, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Vanuatu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Suriname and Vanuatu rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium?
- Suriname ranks 169th and Vanuatu ranks 166th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).