Iceland vs Malta: Marine waters affected by eutrophication
Iceland
0 Square kilometre
in 2025
Malta
0 Square kilometre
in 2025
Iceland rank
18th
Malta rank
18th
Marine waters affected by eutrophication over time
- Iceland
- Malta
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 Square kilometre against 0 Square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0 Square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 18th and Malta ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.67 Square kilometre | 1.33 Square kilometre | 18.33 Square kilometre | Iceland |
| 2010s | 3.4 Square kilometre | 0 Square kilometre | 3.4 Square kilometre | Iceland |
| 2020s | 6.67 Square kilometre | 0 Square kilometre | 6.67 Square kilometre | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher marine waters affected by eutrophication, Iceland or Malta?
- Iceland, at 0 Square kilometre against 0 Square kilometre in Malta as of 2025.
- What is the difference in marine waters affected by eutrophication between Iceland and Malta?
- 0 Square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malta?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Malta rank globally for marine waters affected by eutrophication?
- Iceland ranks 18th and Malta ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Marine waters affected by eutrophication. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.