Latvia vs Malta: Marine waters affected by eutrophication
Latvia
1 Square kilometre
in 2025
Malta
0 Square kilometre
in 2025
Latvia rank
17th
Malta rank
18th
Marine waters affected by eutrophication over time
- Latvia
- Malta
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1 Square kilometre against 0 Square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 1 Square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 17th and Malta ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 278.11 Square kilometre | 1.33 Square kilometre | 276.78 Square kilometre | Latvia |
| 2010s | 239.2 Square kilometre | 0 Square kilometre | 239.2 Square kilometre | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.6667 Square kilometre | 0 Square kilometre | 0.6667 Square kilometre | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher marine waters affected by eutrophication, Latvia or Malta?
- Latvia, at 1 Square kilometre against 0 Square kilometre in Malta as of 2025.
- What is the difference in marine waters affected by eutrophication between Latvia and Malta?
- 1 Square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malta?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Malta rank globally for marine waters affected by eutrophication?
- Latvia ranks 17th and Malta ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Marine waters affected by eutrophication. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.