How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Turkey?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Brazil vs Turkey: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square

Brazil

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Turkey

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Brazil rank

52nd

Turkey rank

51st

Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square over time

Brazil
Turkey

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Turkey ahead.

Brazil ranks 52nd and Turkey ranks 51st of 201 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Turkey in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Brazil	Turkey	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Turkey
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Turkey
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Turkey
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Brazil
2010s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Brazil
2020s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Turkey

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square, Brazil or Turkey?: Turkey, at 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square between Brazil and Turkey?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Turkey?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Turkey rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square?: Brazil ranks 52nd and Turkey ranks 51st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Turkey: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/brazil/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/brazil/turkiye/">Brazil vs Turkey: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 248 places, 12,696 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.