How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Nepal?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burundi vs Nepal: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square

Burundi

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Nepal

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Burundi rank

20th

Nepal rank

19th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square over time

Burundi
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 20th and Nepal ranks 19th of 201 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burundi	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Nepal
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Nepal
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Nepal
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Nepal
2010s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Nepal
2020s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square, Burundi or Nepal?: Nepal, at 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square between Burundi and Nepal?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Nepal?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Nepal rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square?: Burundi ranks 20th and Nepal ranks 19th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Nepal: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/burundi/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/burundi/nepal/">Burundi vs Nepal: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 248 places, 12,696 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.