How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Malawi?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Gambia vs Malawi: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square

Gambia

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Malawi

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Gambia rank

59th

Malawi rank

56th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square over time

Gambia
Malawi

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 59th and Malawi ranks 56th of 201 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Gambia	Malawi	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Gambia
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Gambia
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Gambia
2000s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Gambia
2010s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Gambia
2020s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square, Gambia or Malawi?: Malawi, at 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square between Gambia and Malawi?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Malawi?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Malawi rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square?: Gambia ranks 59th and Malawi ranks 56th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Malawi: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/malawi/">Gambia vs Malawi: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 248 places, 12,696 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.