How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Rwanda?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guatemala vs Rwanda: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square

Guatemala

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Rwanda

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Guatemala rank

41st

Rwanda rank

40th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square over time

Guatemala
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Guatemala ranks 41st and Rwanda ranks 40th of 201 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guatemala	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Rwanda
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Guatemala
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Guatemala
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Rwanda
2010s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Rwanda
2020s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square, Guatemala or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square between Guatemala and Rwanda?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Rwanda?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Rwanda rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square?: Guatemala ranks 41st and Rwanda ranks 40th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Rwanda: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/rwanda/">Guatemala vs Rwanda: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 248 places, 12,696 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.