How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and East Timor?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malawi vs East Timor: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square

Malawi

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

East Timor

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Malawi rank

56th

East Timor rank

58th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square over time

Malawi
East Timor

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was East Timor ahead.

Malawi ranks 56th and East Timor ranks 58th of 201 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malawi	East Timor	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	East Timor
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	East Timor
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	East Timor
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	East Timor
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	East Timor
2020s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square, Malawi or East Timor?: Malawi, at 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square between Malawi and East Timor?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and East Timor?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malawi and East Timor rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture (mt co2e), per square?: Malawi ranks 56th and East Timor ranks 58th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs East Timor: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/malawi/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/malawi/timor-leste/">Malawi vs East Timor: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 248 places, 12,696 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.