Aruba vs Palau: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture
Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture over time
- Aruba
- Palau
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.0015 Mt CO2e against 0 Mt CO2e in Palau, a difference of 0.0015 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Palau ahead.
Aruba ranks 196th and Palau ranks 198th of 201 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | — |
| 1980s | 0 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | — |
| 1990s | 0.0014 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | 0.0014 Mt CO2e | Aruba |
| 2000s | 0.0014 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | 0.0014 Mt CO2e | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.0014 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | 0.0014 Mt CO2e | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.0015 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | 0.0015 Mt CO2e | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture, Aruba or Palau?
- Aruba, at 0.0015 Mt CO2e against 0 Mt CO2e in Palau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture between Aruba and Palau?
- 0.0015 Mt CO2e, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Palau?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Palau rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture?
- Aruba ranks 196th and Palau ranks 198th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agricultural sector. This includes emissions from livestock (IPCC 2006 codes 3.A.1 (enteric fermentation, 3.a.2 (manure management) and crops (IPCC 2006 codes 3.C.1 Emissions from biomass burning, 3.C.7 Rice cultivations). The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).