Central Europe and the Baltics vs Kazakhstan: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture

Central Europe and the Baltics
47.62 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Kazakhstan
22.33 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
43rd
Kazakhstan rank
40th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Kazakhstan
20406080100197019972024

How they compare

Central Europe and the Baltics currently reports 47.62 Mt CO2e against 22.33 Mt CO2e in Kazakhstan, a difference of 25.29 Mt CO2e.

That makes Central Europe and the Baltics's figure about 2.1 times Kazakhstan's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Central Europe and the Baltics has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd and Kazakhstan ranks 40th of 47 groups.

Central Europe and the Baltics has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1970s 95.91 Mt CO2e 30.39 Mt CO2e 65.52 Mt CO2e Central Europe and the Baltics
1980s 102.88 Mt CO2e 33.86 Mt CO2e 69.02 Mt CO2e Central Europe and the Baltics
1990s 69.76 Mt CO2e 24.7 Mt CO2e 45.06 Mt CO2e Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 51.26 Mt CO2e 15.52 Mt CO2e 35.73 Mt CO2e Central Europe and the Baltics
2010s 48.64 Mt CO2e 20.59 Mt CO2e 28.05 Mt CO2e Central Europe and the Baltics
2020s 48.12 Mt CO2e 24.7 Mt CO2e 23.42 Mt CO2e Central Europe and the Baltics

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture, Central Europe and the Baltics or Kazakhstan?
Central Europe and the Baltics, at 47.62 Mt CO2e against 22.33 Mt CO2e in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture between Central Europe and the Baltics and Kazakhstan?
25.29 Mt CO2e, with Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Kazakhstan?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Kazakhstan rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd and Kazakhstan ranks 40th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Kazakhstan: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e/central-europe-and-the-baltics/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e/central-europe-and-the-baltics/kazakhstan/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Kazakhstan: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
248 places, 13,637 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agricultural sector. This includes emissions from livestock (IPCC 2006 codes 3.A.1 (enteric fermentation, 3.a.2 (manure management) and crops (IPCC 2006 codes 3.C.1 Emissions from biomass burning, 3.C.7 Rice cultivations). The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).