Chile vs Cuba: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture
Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture over time
- Chile
- Cuba
How they compare
Chile currently reports 6.65 Mt CO2e against 6.42 Mt CO2e in Cuba, a difference of 0.23 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.
Chile ranks 76th and Cuba ranks 79th of 201 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Cuba in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 7.82 Mt CO2e | 10.48 Mt CO2e | 2.66 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 1980s | 8.31 Mt CO2e | 9.77 Mt CO2e | 1.46 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 1990s | 8.55 Mt CO2e | 8.81 Mt CO2e | 0.2544 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2000s | 8.8 Mt CO2e | 7.64 Mt CO2e | 1.15 Mt CO2e | Chile |
| 2010s | 7.36 Mt CO2e | 8.13 Mt CO2e | 0.7723 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2020s | 6.84 Mt CO2e | 6.82 Mt CO2e | 0.0196 Mt CO2e | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture, Chile or Cuba?
- Chile, at 6.65 Mt CO2e against 6.42 Mt CO2e in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture between Chile and Cuba?
- 0.23 Mt CO2e, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Cuba?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Cuba rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture?
- Chile ranks 76th and Cuba ranks 79th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agricultural sector. This includes emissions from livestock (IPCC 2006 codes 3.A.1 (enteric fermentation, 3.a.2 (manure management) and crops (IPCC 2006 codes 3.C.1 Emissions from biomass burning, 3.C.7 Rice cultivations). The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).