Cuba vs Namibia: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture
Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture over time
- Cuba
- Namibia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 6.42 Mt CO2e against 6.32 Mt CO2e in Namibia, a difference of 0.1 Mt CO2e.
Across all 55 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 79th and Namibia ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 10.48 Mt CO2e | 4 Mt CO2e | 6.48 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 1980s | 9.77 Mt CO2e | 3.35 Mt CO2e | 6.42 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 1990s | 8.81 Mt CO2e | 3.58 Mt CO2e | 5.23 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2000s | 7.64 Mt CO2e | 4.27 Mt CO2e | 3.38 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2010s | 8.13 Mt CO2e | 4.75 Mt CO2e | 3.38 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2020s | 6.82 Mt CO2e | 5.27 Mt CO2e | 1.55 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture, Cuba or Namibia?
- Cuba, at 6.42 Mt CO2e against 6.32 Mt CO2e in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture between Cuba and Namibia?
- 0.1 Mt CO2e, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Namibia?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Namibia rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture?
- Cuba ranks 79th and Namibia ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agricultural sector. This includes emissions from livestock (IPCC 2006 codes 3.A.1 (enteric fermentation, 3.a.2 (manure management) and crops (IPCC 2006 codes 3.C.1 Emissions from biomass burning, 3.C.7 Rice cultivations). The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).