Latvia vs Oman: Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture
Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture over time
- Latvia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 1.36 Mt CO2e against 1.09 Mt CO2e in Latvia, a difference of 0.27 Mt CO2e.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 130th and Oman ranks 128th of 201 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 5 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.57 Mt CO2e | 0.1961 Mt CO2e | 3.38 Mt CO2e | Latvia |
| 1980s | 4.11 Mt CO2e | 0.3637 Mt CO2e | 3.75 Mt CO2e | Latvia |
| 1990s | 2.5 Mt CO2e | 0.525 Mt CO2e | 1.98 Mt CO2e | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1.12 Mt CO2e | 0.736 Mt CO2e | 0.3884 Mt CO2e | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.2 Mt CO2e | 1.07 Mt CO2e | 0.1338 Mt CO2e | Latvia |
| 2020s | 1.14 Mt CO2e | 1.31 Mt CO2e | 0.164 Mt CO2e | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture, Latvia or Oman?
- Oman, at 1.36 Mt CO2e against 1.09 Mt CO2e in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture between Latvia and Oman?
- 0.27 Mt CO2e, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Oman?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Oman rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from agriculture?
- Latvia ranks 130th and Oman ranks 128th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agricultural sector. This includes emissions from livestock (IPCC 2006 codes 3.A.1 (enteric fermentation, 3.a.2 (manure management) and crops (IPCC 2006 codes 3.C.1 Emissions from biomass burning, 3.C.7 Rice cultivations). The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).