How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Norway?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Indonesia vs Norway: Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square

Indonesia

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Norway

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Indonesia rank

141st

Norway rank

142nd

Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square over time

Indonesia
Norway

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 141st and Norway ranks 142nd of 197 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Indonesia	Norway	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Indonesia
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Indonesia
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Indonesia
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Indonesia
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Indonesia
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per square, Indonesia or Norway?: Indonesia, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per square between Indonesia and Norway?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Norway?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Norway rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per square?: Indonesia ranks 141st and Norway ranks 142nd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Norway: Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/norway/">Indonesia vs Norway: Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 244 places, 12,543 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.