How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Pakistan?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Liberia vs Pakistan: Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square

Liberia

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Pakistan

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Liberia rank

16th

Pakistan rank

15th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square over time

Liberia
Pakistan

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Liberia, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Liberia ranks 16th and Pakistan ranks 15th of 197 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Liberia	Pakistan	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Pakistan
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Pakistan
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Pakistan
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Pakistan
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Pakistan
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per square, Liberia or Pakistan?: Pakistan, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per square between Liberia and Pakistan?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Pakistan?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Liberia and Pakistan rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per square?: Liberia ranks 16th and Pakistan ranks 15th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Pakistan: Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/liberia/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/liberia/pakistan/">Liberia vs Pakistan: Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 244 places, 12,543 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.