Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e)

Sweden
12.11 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
14.67 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sweden rank
4th
Zimbabwe rank
2nd

Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e) over time

  • Sweden
  • Zimbabwe
-50050100197119972024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 14.67 % change on previous year against 12.11 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 2.56 % change on previous year.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 186 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 7.85 % change on previous year -3.93 % change on previous year 11.79 % change on previous year Sweden
1980s 1.22 % change on previous year 3.57 % change on previous year 2.34 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1990s 2.11 % change on previous year -0.1295 % change on previous year 2.24 % change on previous year Sweden
2000s 0.1291 % change on previous year -4.29 % change on previous year 4.42 % change on previous year Sweden
2010s 2.19 % change on previous year 6.61 % change on previous year 4.42 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 4.34 % change on previous year 10.59 % change on previous year 6.25 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from fugitive emissions (energy) (mt co2e), Sweden or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 14.67 % change on previous year against 12.11 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from fugitive emissions (energy) (mt co2e) between Sweden and Zimbabwe?
2.56 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Sweden and Zimbabwe rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from fugitive emissions (energy) (mt co2e)?
Sweden ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-fugitive-emissions-energy-mt-co2e-annual-growth-rate/sweden/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-fugitive-emissions-energy-mt-co2e-annual-growth-rate/sweden/zimbabwe/">Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
233 places, 12,344 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.