Cape Verde vs French Polynesia: Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e)

Cape Verde
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
162nd
French Polynesia rank
163rd

Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e) over time

  • Cape Verde
  • French Polynesia
0000197019962023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.4 times French Polynesia's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 162nd and French Polynesia ranks 163rd of 192 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde French Polynesia Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Cape Verde
1980s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from fugitive emissions (energy) (mt co2e), Cape Verde or French Polynesia?
Cape Verde, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from fugitive emissions (energy) (mt co2e) between Cape Verde and French Polynesia?
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and French Polynesia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and French Polynesia rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from fugitive emissions (energy) (mt co2e)?
Cape Verde ranks 162nd and French Polynesia ranks 163rd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs French Polynesia: Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-fugitive-emissions-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-fugitive-emissions-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/french-polynesia/">Cape Verde vs French Polynesia: Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 12,273 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.