Belarus vs Ecuador: Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt)

Belarus
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
102nd
Ecuador rank
101st

Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt) over time

  • Belarus
  • Ecuador
0000197019962023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 102nd and Ecuador ranks 101st of 193 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from industrial combustion (energy) (mt), Belarus or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from industrial combustion (energy) (mt) between Belarus and Ecuador?
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from industrial combustion (energy) (mt)?
Belarus ranks 102nd and Ecuador ranks 101st of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Ecuador: Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-industrial-combustion-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/belarus/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-industrial-combustion-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/belarus/ecuador/">Belarus vs Ecuador: Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 12,327 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.