Rwanda vs Trinidad and Tobago: Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt)

Rwanda
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
57th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
58th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00000197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Rwanda ranks 57th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 58th of 193 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from industrial combustion (energy) (mt), Rwanda or Trinidad and Tobago?
Rwanda, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from industrial combustion (energy) (mt) between Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago?
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from industrial combustion (energy) (mt)?
Rwanda ranks 57th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 58th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Trinidad and Tobago: Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-industrial-combustion-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-industrial-combustion-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/trinidad-and-tobago/">Rwanda vs Trinidad and Tobago: Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 12,327 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.