Armenia vs Cuba: Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes
Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes over time
- Armenia
- Cuba
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0.0003 Mt CO2e against 0 Mt CO2e in Cuba, a difference of 0.0003 Mt CO2e.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.
Armenia ranks 75th and Cuba ranks 78th of 94 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Cuba in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 Mt CO2e | 0.0005 Mt CO2e | 0.0005 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 1980s | 0 Mt CO2e | 0.0007 Mt CO2e | 0.0007 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 1990s | 0 Mt CO2e | 0.0001 Mt CO2e | 0.0001 Mt CO2e | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | Armenia |
| 2010s | 0.0002 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | 0.0002 Mt CO2e | Armenia |
| 2020s | 0.0003 Mt CO2e | 0 Mt CO2e | 0.0003 Mt CO2e | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from industrial processes, Armenia or Cuba?
- Armenia, at 0.0003 Mt CO2e against 0 Mt CO2e in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from industrial processes between Armenia and Cuba?
- 0.0003 Mt CO2e, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Cuba?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Cuba rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from industrial processes?
- Armenia ranks 75th and Cuba ranks 78th of 94 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from industrial processes including IPCC 2006 codes 2.A.1 Cement production, 2.A.2 Lime production, 2.A.3 Glass Production, 2.A.4 Other Process Uses of Carbonates, 2.B Chemical Industry, 2.C Metal Industry, 2.D Non-Energy Products from Fuels and Solvent Use, 2.E Electronics Industry, 2.F Product Uses as Substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances, 2.G Other Product Manufacture and Use and 5.A Indirect N2O emissions from the atmospheric deposition of nitrogen in NOx and NH3. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).