Japan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes

Japan
0.2676 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
0.2947 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Japan rank
11th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
9th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes over time

  • Japan
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.20.40.6197019972024

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.2947 Mt CO2e against 0.2676 Mt CO2e in Japan, a difference of 0.0271 Mt CO2e.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 11th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 9th of 94 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 5 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1970s 0.4599 Mt CO2e 0.0134 Mt CO2e 0.4465 Mt CO2e Japan
1980s 0.3096 Mt CO2e 0.0273 Mt CO2e 0.2823 Mt CO2e Japan
1990s 0.2941 Mt CO2e 0.096 Mt CO2e 0.1981 Mt CO2e Japan
2000s 0.3242 Mt CO2e 0.2757 Mt CO2e 0.0485 Mt CO2e Japan
2010s 0.3679 Mt CO2e 0.3455 Mt CO2e 0.0223 Mt CO2e Japan
2020s 0.281 Mt CO2e 0.3035 Mt CO2e 0.0226 Mt CO2e Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from industrial processes, Japan or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.2947 Mt CO2e against 0.2676 Mt CO2e in Japan as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from industrial processes between Japan and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0271 Mt CO2e, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Trinidad and Tobago?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Japan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from industrial processes?
Japan ranks 11th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 9th of 94 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-industrial-processes-mt-co2e/japan/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-industrial-processes-mt-co2e/japan/trinidad-and-tobago/">Japan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 7,700 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from industrial processes including IPCC 2006 codes 2.A.1 Cement production, 2.A.2 Lime production, 2.A.3 Glass Production, 2.A.4 Other Process Uses of Carbonates, 2.B Chemical Industry, 2.C Metal Industry, 2.D Non-Energy Products from Fuels and Solvent Use, 2.E Electronics Industry, 2.F Product Uses as Substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances, 2.G Other Product Manufacture and Use and 5.A Indirect N2O emissions from the atmospheric deposition of nitrogen in NOx and NH3. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).