Brazil vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per

Brazil
0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Brazil rank
55th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
57th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per over time

  • Brazil
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
00000197019972024

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP against 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 55th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 57th of 191 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 4 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Brazil
1980s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Brazil
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Brazil
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from power industry (energy) (mt co2e), per, Brazil or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Brazil, at 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP against 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from power industry (energy) (mt co2e), per between Brazil and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from power industry (energy) (mt co2e), per?
Brazil ranks 55th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 57th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-power-industry-energy-mt-co2e-per-unit-of-gdp/brazil/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-power-industry-energy-mt-co2e-per-unit-of-gdp/brazil/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Brazil vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP
Unit
Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
238 places, 12,139 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.