How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Norway?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Argentina vs Norway: Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square

Argentina

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Norway

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Argentina rank

136th

Norway rank

134th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square over time

Argentina
Norway

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.

Argentina ranks 136th and Norway ranks 134th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Argentina	Norway	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Argentina
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from transport (energy) (mt co2e), per square, Argentina or Norway?: Norway, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from transport (energy) (mt co2e), per square between Argentina and Norway?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Norway?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Norway rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from transport (energy) (mt co2e), per square?: Argentina ranks 136th and Norway ranks 134th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Norway: Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-transport-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/argentina/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-transport-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/argentina/norway/">Argentina vs Norway: Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 241 places, 12,381 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.