How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?

12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square

Sudan

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Sudan rank

163rd

Zimbabwe rank

161st

Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square over time

Sudan
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Sudan ranks 163rd and Zimbabwe ranks 161st of 194 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sudan	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from transport (energy) (mt co2e), per square, Sudan or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from transport (energy) (mt co2e), per square between Sudan and Zimbabwe?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from transport (energy) (mt co2e), per square?: Sudan ranks 163rd and Zimbabwe ranks 161st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-transport-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-transport-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/sudan/zimbabwe/">Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 241 places, 12,381 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.