What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per capita between Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?

0 Mt CO2e per person, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per capita

Congo

0 Mt CO2e per person

in 2024

Sao Tome and Principe

0 Mt CO2e per person

in 2024

Congo rank

148th

Sao Tome and Principe rank

147th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per capita over time

Congo
Sao Tome and Principe

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per person against 0 Mt CO2e per person in Congo, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 148th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 147th of 203 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Sao Tome and Principe	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Congo
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Congo
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Congo
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Congo
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Congo
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per capita, Congo or Sao Tome and Principe?: Sao Tome and Principe, at 0 Mt CO2e per person against 0 Mt CO2e per person in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per capita between Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?: 0 Mt CO2e per person, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Congo and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per capita?: Congo ranks 148th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 147th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-waste-mt-co2e-per-capita/congo-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-waste-mt-co2e-per-capita/congo-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/">Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per capita
Unit: Mt CO2e per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.