What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Mauritania?

0 Mt CO2e per person, with Mauritania ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mauritania?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritania: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per capita

Equatorial Guinea

0 Mt CO2e per person

in 2024

Mauritania

0 Mt CO2e per person

in 2024

Equatorial Guinea rank

115th

Mauritania rank

114th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per capita over time

Equatorial Guinea
Mauritania

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per person against 0 Mt CO2e per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritania ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 115th and Mauritania ranks 114th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Mauritania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Equatorial Guinea	Mauritania	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Mauritania
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Mauritania
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Mauritania
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Equatorial Guinea
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Equatorial Guinea
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Mauritania?: Mauritania, at 0 Mt CO2e per person against 0 Mt CO2e per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Mauritania?: 0 Mt CO2e per person, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mauritania?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Mauritania rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per capita?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 115th and Mauritania ranks 114th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritania: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-waste-mt-co2e-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-waste-mt-co2e-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/mauritania/">Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritania: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per capita
Unit: Mt CO2e per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.