How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Eswatini?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burkina Faso vs Eswatini: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Eswatini

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Burkina Faso rank

139th

Eswatini rank

142nd

Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre over time

Burkina Faso
Eswatini

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 139th and Eswatini ranks 142nd of 203 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burkina Faso	Eswatini	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Eswatini
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Eswatini
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Eswatini
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Eswatini
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Eswatini
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Eswatini?: Burkina Faso, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Eswatini?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Eswatini?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Eswatini rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre?: Burkina Faso ranks 139th and Eswatini ranks 142nd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Eswatini: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-waste-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-waste-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/eswatini/">Burkina Faso vs Eswatini: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.