Europe & Central Asia vs Guatemala: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre

Europe & Central Asia
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia rank
33rd
Guatemala rank
34th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Guatemala
000197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 6.5 times Europe & Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Europe & Central Asia ahead.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 33rd and Guatemala ranks 34th of 47 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Guatemala Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Europe & Central Asia
1980s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Europe & Central Asia
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre, Europe & Central Asia or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre between Europe & Central Asia and Guatemala?
0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Guatemala?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Guatemala rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 33rd and Guatemala ranks 34th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Guatemala: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-waste-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-waste-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/guatemala/">Europe & Central Asia vs Guatemala: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.