How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Namibia?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mauritania vs Namibia: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre

Mauritania

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Mauritania rank

198th

Namibia rank

201st

Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre over time

Mauritania
Namibia

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 2.1 times Namibia's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 198th and Namibia ranks 201st of 203 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mauritania	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Mauritania
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Mauritania
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Mauritania
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Mauritania
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Mauritania
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Namibia?: Mauritania, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Namibia?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Namibia?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Namibia rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre?: Mauritania ranks 198th and Namibia ranks 201st of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Namibia: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-waste-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-waste-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/">Mauritania vs Namibia: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.