How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Zimbabwe?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre

Tanzania

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Tanzania rank

173rd

Zimbabwe rank

170th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre over time

Tanzania
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Tanzania ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 170th of 203 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Tanzania	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre, Tanzania or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre between Tanzania and Zimbabwe?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Zimbabwe?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Tanzania and Zimbabwe rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from waste (mt co2e), per square kilometre?: Tanzania ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 170th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-waste-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-waste-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zimbabwe/">Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.