Cuba vs Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste

Cuba
4.84 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
4.78 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Cuba rank
54th
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank
57th

Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste over time

  • Cuba
  • Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
2345197019972024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 4.84 Mt CO2e against 4.78 Mt CO2e in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, a difference of 0.06 Mt CO2e.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 54th and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 57th of 203 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China Difference Ahead
1970s 3.41 Mt CO2e 1.98 Mt CO2e 1.43 Mt CO2e Cuba
1980s 3.92 Mt CO2e 2.69 Mt CO2e 1.23 Mt CO2e Cuba
1990s 3.87 Mt CO2e 3.42 Mt CO2e 0.45 Mt CO2e Cuba
2000s 4.03 Mt CO2e 3.85 Mt CO2e 0.1825 Mt CO2e Cuba
2010s 4.34 Mt CO2e 4.26 Mt CO2e 0.0821 Mt CO2e Cuba
2020s 4.86 Mt CO2e 4.68 Mt CO2e 0.1809 Mt CO2e Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions from waste, Cuba or Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
Cuba, at 4.84 Mt CO2e against 4.78 Mt CO2e in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions from waste between Cuba and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
0.06 Mt CO2e, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions from waste?
Cuba ranks 54th and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 57th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-waste-mt-co2e/cuba/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-from-waste-mt-co2e/cuba/hong-kong-sar-china/">Cuba vs Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the waste sector. This includes emissions from solid waste (IPCC 2006 codes 4.A Solid Waste Disposal, 4.B Biological Treatment of Solid Waste, 4.C Incineration and Open Burning of Waste) and wastewater treatment (IPCC 2006 code 4.D Wastewater Treatment and Discharge). The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).