How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita

Rwanda

0 Mt CO2e per person

in 2024

Sao Tome and Principe

0 Mt CO2e per person

in 2024

Rwanda rank

185th

Sao Tome and Principe rank

182nd

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita over time

Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per person against 0 Mt CO2e per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 185th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 182nd of 203 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Rwanda	Sao Tome and Principe	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Rwanda
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Rwanda
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Rwanda
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Rwanda
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Rwanda
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per capita, Rwanda or Sao Tome and Principe?: Sao Tome and Principe, at 0 Mt CO2e per person against 0 Mt CO2e per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per capita between Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?: 0 Mt CO2e per person, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per capita?: Rwanda ranks 185th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 182nd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-capita/rwanda/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-capita/rwanda/sao-tome-and-principe/">Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita
Unit: Mt CO2e per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.