Belarus vs Nicaragua: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per

Belarus
0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
89th
Nicaragua rank
91st

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per over time

  • Belarus
  • Nicaragua
00000197019962023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 89th and Nicaragua ranks 91st of 203 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per, Belarus or Nicaragua?
Belarus, at 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per between Belarus and Nicaragua?
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nicaragua?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Nicaragua rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per?
Belarus ranks 89th and Nicaragua ranks 91st of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Nicaragua: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/belarus/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/belarus/nicaragua/">Belarus vs Nicaragua: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.