How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nauru?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Nauru: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per

Congo

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Nauru

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Congo rank

147th

Nauru rank

148th

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per over time

Congo
Nauru

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Nauru, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nauru ahead.

Congo ranks 147th and Nauru ranks 148th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Nauru in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Nauru	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Nauru
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Nauru
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Nauru
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Congo
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Congo
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per, Congo or Nauru?: Congo, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Nauru as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per between Congo and Nauru?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nauru?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Congo and Nauru rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per?: Congo ranks 147th and Nauru ranks 148th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Nauru: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/naoero/">Congo vs Nauru: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.