How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Zimbabwe?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Finland vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per

Finland

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Finland rank

162nd

Zimbabwe rank

164th

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per over time

Finland
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 162nd and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Finland	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Finland
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Finland
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Finland
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Finland
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per, Finland or Zimbabwe?: Finland, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per between Finland and Zimbabwe?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Zimbabwe?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Finland and Zimbabwe rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per?: Finland ranks 162nd and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/finland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/finland/zimbabwe/">Finland vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.