Iceland vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per
Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per over time
- Iceland
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 201st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 202nd of 203 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | Iceland |
| 1980s | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | Iceland |
| 1990s | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2000s | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2010s | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2020s | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per, Iceland or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Iceland, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per between Iceland and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per?
- Iceland ranks 201st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 202nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.