How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per

Latvia

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

161st

Zimbabwe rank

164th

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per over time

Latvia
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 203 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Latvia
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per, Latvia or Zimbabwe?: Latvia, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per between Latvia and Zimbabwe?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per?: Latvia ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 164th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/latvia/zimbabwe/">Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.