How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Norway?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mozambique vs Norway: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per

Mozambique

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Norway

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Mozambique rank

174th

Norway rank

172nd

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per over time

Mozambique
Norway

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.

Mozambique ranks 174th and Norway ranks 172nd of 203 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mozambique	Norway	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per, Mozambique or Norway?: Norway, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per between Mozambique and Norway?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Norway?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Norway rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per?: Mozambique ranks 174th and Norway ranks 172nd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Norway: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/norway/">Mozambique vs Norway: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.