How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uganda?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Rwanda vs Uganda: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per

Rwanda

0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Uganda

0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Rwanda rank

36th

Uganda rank

37th

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per over time

Rwanda
Uganda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 37th of 203 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Rwanda	Uganda	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Rwanda
1980s	0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Rwanda
1990s	0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Rwanda
2000s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Rwanda
2010s	0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Rwanda
2020s	0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per, Rwanda or Uganda?: Rwanda, at 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per between Rwanda and Uganda?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uganda?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Uganda rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per?: Rwanda ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 37th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Uganda: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/uganda/">Rwanda vs Uganda: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.