How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and United Kingdom?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Norway vs United Kingdom: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit

Norway

0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP

in 2024

United Kingdom

0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Norway rank

172nd

United Kingdom rank

175th

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit over time

Norway
United Kingdom

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP against 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP in United Kingdom, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times United Kingdom's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Norway ranks 172nd and United Kingdom ranks 175th of 200 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Norway	United Kingdom	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per unit, Norway or United Kingdom?: Norway, at 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP against 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP in United Kingdom as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per unit between Norway and United Kingdom?: 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and United Kingdom?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Norway and United Kingdom rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), per unit?: Norway ranks 172nd and United Kingdom ranks 175th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs United Kingdom: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-unit-of-gdp/norway/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-unit-of-gdp/norway/united-kingdom/">Norway vs United Kingdom: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP
Unit: Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 247 places, 12,498 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.