Botswana vs Kazakhstan: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Botswana
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Botswana currently reports -27.9% against -28.2% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Botswana ranks 178th and Kazakhstan ranks 181st of 203 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -11.9% | -34.4% | 22.5% | Botswana |
| 2000s | -9.6% | -47.5% | 37.8% | Botswana |
| 2010s | -12.7% | -32.0% | 19.3% | Botswana |
| 2020s | -28.0% | -25.7% | 2.3% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Botswana or Kazakhstan?
- Botswana, at -27.9% against -28.2% in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Botswana and Kazakhstan?
- 0.3%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Kazakhstan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Kazakhstan rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Botswana ranks 178th and Kazakhstan ranks 181st of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.