Central Europe and the Baltics vs Sao Tome and Principe: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF

Central Europe and the Baltics
-53.4%
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
109.3%
in 2024
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
47th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
44th

Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-50050100199120072024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 109.3% against -53.4% in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 162.7%.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 2.0 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 47th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 47 groups.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s -22.0% 16.6% 38.6% Sao Tome and Principe
2000s -40.1% 47.3% 87.4% Sao Tome and Principe
2010s -46.8% 80.4% 127.2% Sao Tome and Principe
2020s -51.4% 105.0% 156.5% Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Central Europe and the Baltics or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 109.3% against -53.4% in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2024.
What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Central Europe and the Baltics and Sao Tome and Principe?
162.7%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Sao Tome and Principe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 47th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 44th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Sao Tome and Principe: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-percent-change-from-1990/central-europe-and-the-baltics/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/methane-ch4-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-percent-change-from-1990/central-europe-and-the-baltics/sao-tome-and-principe/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Sao Tome and Principe: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990)
Unit
% change from 1990
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 8,500 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.