Faroe Islands vs Nepal: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Faroe Islands
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 10.1% against 9.2% in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Faroe Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Faroe Islands ranks 134th and Nepal ranks 132nd of 203 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.2% | 6.6% | 7.8% | Nepal |
| 2000s | -0.4% | 23.3% | 23.6% | Nepal |
| 2010s | 3.5% | 40.2% | 36.7% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 8.2% | 33.0% | 24.9% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Faroe Islands or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 10.1% against 9.2% in Faroe Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Faroe Islands and Nepal?
- 0.9%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Nepal?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Faroe Islands and Nepal rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Faroe Islands ranks 134th and Nepal ranks 132nd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.