Guatemala vs IBRD only: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Guatemala
- IBRD only
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 149.3% against 35.3% in IBRD only, a difference of 114.0%.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 4.2 times IBRD only's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 30th and IBRD only ranks 31st of 203 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | IBRD only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.5% | -1.9% | 16.4% | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 47.5% | 6.8% | 40.8% | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 100.6% | 23.6% | 77.0% | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 141.8% | 31.6% | 110.1% | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Guatemala or IBRD only?
- Guatemala, at 149.3% against 35.3% in IBRD only as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Guatemala and IBRD only?
- 114.0%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and IBRD only?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and IBRD only rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Guatemala ranks 30th and IBRD only ranks 31st of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.