IDA total vs Jordan: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- IDA total
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 303.2% against 91.6% in IDA total, a difference of 211.6%.
That makes Jordan's figure about 3.3 times IDA total's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
IDA total ranks 7th and Jordan ranks 7th of 45 groups.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA total | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.8% | 34.9% | 19.1% | Jordan |
| 2000s | 37.4% | 78.9% | 41.5% | Jordan |
| 2010s | 64.9% | 189.0% | 124.1% | Jordan |
| 2020s | 85.9% | 283.0% | 197.1% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, IDA total or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 303.2% against 91.6% in IDA total as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between IDA total and Jordan?
- 211.6%, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Jordan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do IDA total and Jordan rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- IDA total ranks 7th and Jordan ranks 7th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.