Jordan vs Mozambique: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Jordan
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 340.1% against 303.2% in Jordan, a difference of 36.9%.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 7th and Mozambique ranks 5th of 203 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 34.9% | 13.1% | 21.8% | Jordan |
| 2000s | 78.9% | 51.4% | 27.5% | Jordan |
| 2010s | 189.0% | 223.7% | 34.6% | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 283.0% | 320.2% | 37.2% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Jordan or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 340.1% against 303.2% in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Jordan and Mozambique?
- 36.9%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mozambique?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Mozambique rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Jordan ranks 7th and Mozambique ranks 5th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.