Kiribati vs Senegal: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Kiribati
- Senegal
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 121.9% against 113.8% in Senegal, a difference of 8.1%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Senegal ahead.
Kiribati ranks 40th and Senegal ranks 43rd of 203 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Senegal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.3% | 12.5% | 5.2% | Senegal |
| 2000s | 36.4% | 33.4% | 3.0% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 72.0% | 76.4% | 4.4% | Senegal |
| 2020s | 111.6% | 108.5% | 3.1% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Kiribati or Senegal?
- Kiribati, at 121.9% against 113.8% in Senegal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Kiribati and Senegal?
- 8.1%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Senegal?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Senegal rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Kiribati ranks 40th and Senegal ranks 43rd of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.