Low income vs Mozambique: Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Low income
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 340.1% against 119.3% in Low income, a difference of 220.8%.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 2.9 times Low income's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Low income ahead.
Low income ranks 3rd and Mozambique ranks 5th of 45 groups.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.8% | 13.1% | 0.3% | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 40.3% | 51.4% | 11.0% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 78.8% | 223.7% | 144.9% | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 111.2% | 320.2% | 209.0% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Low income or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 340.1% against 119.3% in Low income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Low income and Mozambique?
- 220.8%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Mozambique?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Low income and Mozambique rank globally for methane (ch4) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Low income ranks 3rd and Mozambique ranks 5th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of methane (CH4), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.